Salon.com is reporting today that The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, local philanthropy extrodinaire, has pledged ten million smackaroos to the Discovery Institute since 2000. Wait, you say, the same Discovery Institute tank of thinkers that promotes Intelligent Design? Yes, we tell you, that same Discovery Institute. Say it ain't so, Bill.
The money was specifically given to the Cascadia Project to research transportation issues in the area. Seattlest is anxiously awaiting a report from the Cascadia Project that determines that it's time to give up on addressing our traffic problems. We've done a lot of studying, they'll say, but where we're at now seems to indicate that we can't go any further - God just built Seattle with a lot of traffic.
Similarly, we hope not to hear anything out of the Redmond camp alluding to the divine inevitablity of virii and trojans in our software.
From Salon:
Even if the Gates money doesn't directly fund Discovery's I.D. work, the grant has created an image problem for the foundation. "Its support of the Discovery Institute is not commendable because of the murky situation created," wrote Francisco Ayala, a biologist at the University of California at Irvine, in an e-mail. "Many people will not notice that Gates' support is restricted to one particular project ... I am reminded of the saying, 'The wife of Caesar not only should be chaste, but also appear to be so.'" Ayala raises an intriguing question: As the Discovery Institute becomes increasingly associated with intelligent design, does the Gates foundation worry that its own good name might get tied up in the political storm? "It's a good question," Shaw says. "When a grantee's work is so much associated with something not related to the work you are funding, how does that affect your grant? I don't know the answer to that. It's something we are going to have to look at."

Friendly Folk-Pop for the Kids: Hey Marseilles at Vera This Saturday


As a web worker, Microsoft is the bane of my existence. They're not good citizens of the tech community and take every chance to wreck great ideas, turn them into MS products and kill the open-source movement. So, it's with a heavy heart that I find myself defending Emperor Bill.
The premise that the Gates Foundation supports "Intelligent Design" is ridiculous. Should the foundation have rejected a worthwhile grant application for a specific program because of the political leanings of it's organization? Is this scandal material? C'mon.
I admit this is interesting, so my beef isn't with you Dan, but with the overwhelming amount of good the Gates Foundation does in our region and around the world, aren't we kind of missing the boat here?